Primary tabs

View
Show Changes(active tab)

Status message

No visible changes

Key to Changes

This text is Revised text

This word has been added to the text

This text is Last Published text

This word has been removed from the text

Modifed styling with no visual changes

Strategic Objective

Goal 1.3: Reduce Risk to the Nation’s Critical Infrastructure, Key Leadership, and Events

Strategic Objective

Reduce Risk to the Nation’s Critical Infrastructure, Key Leadership, and Events

Themes:

National Defense

DHS.gov

Facebook Twitter Linkdin Mail RSS

XML

CSV

Overview
Progress Update

Overview

DHS has national leadership responsibility for enhancing security to the Nation’s critical infrastructure and protecting key leaders, facilities, and National Special Security Events. DHS reduces risk across a wide portfolio of activities, including the agriculture and food sector, the travel and trade system, and the financial services sector. These systems are vulnerable to criminal exploitation and both physical and cyber-attacks. DHS also maintains constant guard over key leaders and during high-profile events, reducing the possibility that these events could be

Progress Update

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), has highlighted this goal as a focus area for improvement.

Introduction
The American way of life depends upon the effective functioning of the nation’s critical infrastructure and key resources, and the protection of key leaders and events. Due to a variety of challenges in program execution for protective services provided by the USSS and the ability to protect critical infrastructure and improve federal building security, this goal is as a focus area for improvement.

Major Achievements
The USSS continued to prevent and defend against attacks on protected persons, locations, and events, to protect the integrity of U.S. currency, and to successfully prosecute individuals conducting financial crimes.

To improve security for the Nation’s critical infrastructure, the National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD) published the Joint National Priorities for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience in October 2014. In addition, the Federal Protective Service (FPS), at the direction of DHS leadership, enhanced its presence and security at high risk federal buildings and the surrounding communities in targeted cities throughout the country by deploying staff to augment the existing law enforcement staffing in those cities to meet surge operational objectives. NPPD also developed national and departmental policies on countering improvised explosive devices and worked with Intelligence & Analysis to publish a strategic threat assessment for the Electricity subsector. The U.S Coast Guard (USCG) conducted domestic port security vulnerability assessments, and coordinated support for protective operations during National Special Security Events. The Office of Operations Coordination performed risk assessments for nearly 8,000 special events (as of September 30, 2014).

Major Challenges & Opportunities for Improvement
In terms of protecting key leaders and facilities, challenges in the areas of staffing, training, and protective countermeasures have resulted in the potential increased risk and decreased program effectiveness for the USSS, as was evidenced by certain protective challenges at the White House Complex. In light of these challenges, the DHS Secretary established an independent Protective Mission Panel to review USSS policies, staffing, and operations, and to provide recommendations for enhancing the USSS protective mission.

Recent heightened threat-level events, both domestically and internationally, and the subsequent focus on reinforcing the protection of critical infrastructure and enhancing federal building security—managed by the Federal Protective Service in NPPD—has stretched the FPS law enforcement capacity and availability to conduct facility security assessments to diagnose vulnerabilities and work with critical infrastructure owners to address shortfalls while maintaining an increased security presence at federal facilities.

Highlighted Future Actions
USSS has begun to adopt strategies recommended by the United States Secret Service Protective Mission Panel to address programmatic risks. The Mission Panel recommended focusing on specific areas to improve which include: 1) conducting additional training and obtaining additional personnel; 2) improving perimeter infrastructure; and 3) improving technology and operations. Currently the USSS is actively working to implement near term solutions in response to the Panel’s recommendations, and is aggressively pursuing additional funding and resources to achieve robust and permanent solutions.

To sustain the enhanced security and protective measures associated with federal building security managed by FPS, OMB authorized a fee increase for FPS for fiscal year 2017. To provide a long term solution to this situation, NPPD will develop alternative operational models and a path forward that relies less heavily on voluntary compliance and a fee-based structure to enforce recommended countermeasures. In addition, the Government Accountability Office audit recommendations will continue to be implemented to improve future operations.

Expand All

Strategic Goals

Strategic Goal:

Mission 1: Prevent terrorism and enhance security

Statement:

Prevent terrorism and enhance security

Strategic Objectives

Goal 1.1: Prevent Terrorist Attacks

Statement:

Prevent Terrorist Attacks

Description:

The Department remains vigilant to new and evolving threats in order to protect the Nation from a terrorist attack. Although the U.S. Government’s counterterrorism efforts have degraded the ability of al-Qa’ida’s senior leadership in Afghanistan and Pakistan to centrally plan and execute sophisticated external attacks, since 2009 we have seen the rise of al-Qa’ida affiliates, such as al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula and the al-Nusrah Front in Syria. These groups have made attempts to export terrorism to our Nation. Additionally, we face the threat of domestic-based "lone offenders" and those who are inspired by violent extremist ideologies to radicalize and commit acts of terrorism against Americans and the Nation. These threats come in multiple forms and, because of the nature of independent actors, may be hardest to detect.

We will pursue the following strategies to prevent terrorist attacks:

Analyze, fuse, and disseminate terrorism information by sharing information with, and utilizing threat analysis alongside, stakeholders across the homeland security enterprise. We remain committed to integrating critical data sources, such as those for biometric data, by consolidating or federating screening and vetting operations. We will also continually increase and integrate domain awareness capabilities, as well as improve our ability to fully utilize vast amounts of intelligence and other information—the so-called "big data" challenge—while rigorously protecting privacy and civil rights and civil liberties.
Deter and disrupt operations by leveraging the intelligence, information sharing, technological, operational, and policy-making elements within DHS to facilitate a cohesive and coordinated operational response. We will also develop intelligence sources and leverage research and analysis to identify and illustrate the tactics, behaviors, and indicators potentially associated with violent extremism as well as factors that may influence violent extremism, and jointly develop with federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial partners training for frontline law enforcement officers on behaviors that may be telling regarding violent extremist activity.
Strengthen transportation security by using a multi-layered risk-based approach to detect malicious actors and dangerous items at various entry and exit points in the travel and trade system. We will also improve coordination with foreign governments and stakeholders to expand pre-departure screening and enhance transportation security operations among willing partners to mitigate risks from overseas.
Counter violent extremism by: 1) supporting community-community-based problem solving and integration efforts, as well as local law enforcement programs; and 2) working with our partners to share information with frontline law enforcement partners, communities, families, and the private sector about how violent extremists are using the Internet and how to protect themselves and their communities.

Learn More

FY 14-15 Priority Goal: Strengthen aviation security counterterrorism capabilities by using intelligence driven information and risk-based decisions.

Statement:

Strengthen aviation security counterterrorism capabilities and improve the passenger experience by using intelligence driven information and risk-based decisions. By September 30, 2015, TSA will expand the use of risk-based security initiatives to increase the percentage of travelers eligible for expedited screening at airports to 50 percent and enhance the passenger experience.

Description:

TSA performs and oversees security operations at the nation’s airports, screening over 650 million passengers annually, to ensure the freedom of movement of people and commerce. In an effort to strengthen aviation security while enhancing the passenger experience, TSA is focusing on risk-based, intelligence-driven security procedures and enhancing its use of technology. Since 2011, the agency has implemented several risk-based initiatives including the TSA Preü™ expedited screening program; the nationwide implementation of modified screening protocols for passengers 12 and younger, passengers 75 and over, and active duty service members; expediting physical screening of Veterans on chartered Honor Flights; and providing modified screening to Wounded Warriors. A number of initiatives will further enable TSA to reach its goal of expanding expedited screening for known populations in order to focus on those that are unknown including the development and deployment of the TSA Pre✓™ Application and TSA Risk Assessment programs; expansion of TSA Pre✓™participation to international air carrier; continued expansion of the Known Crewmember program; and developing operational policies, procedures, and other activities such as the evolution of checkpoint screening technologies to support deployment of Risk Assessments that will grow the volume of passengers eligible for expedited screening.

As of December 2013, on a weekly basis, more than 32% of passengers receive some form of expedited screening, and TSA expects to continue to grow that number. While driving the growth of eligible populations is key to the initiative’s long term success, TSA faces challenges in aligning, planning, and executing activities for incorporating these various populations. The success of achieving TSA’s risk-based security milestones is in many ways reliant upon external and internal partners that TSA continues to work with to mitigate these challenges.

Learn More

Goal 1.2: Prevent and Protect Against the Unauthorized Acquisition or Use of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Materials and Capabilities

Statement:

Prevent and Protect Against the Unauthorized Acquisition or Use of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Materials and Capabilities

Description:

Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats are enduring areas of concern. The consequences of these attacks are potentially high even though the likelihood of their occurrence is relatively low. Small scale chemical attacks are expected to remain more likely because the relative lack of specialized skills and knowledge required to conduct such attacks. However, nuclear terrorism and bioterrorism pose the most strategically significant risk because of their potential consequences. Although the difficulty of stealing a nuclear weapon or fabricating one from stolen or diverted weapons materials reduces the likelihood of this type of attack, the extremely high consequences of an improvised nuclear device attack make it an ongoing top homeland security risk.

We will pursue the following strategies to prevent and protect against the unauthorized acquisition or use of chemical biological, radiological, and nuclear materials and capabilities:

Anticipate chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear emerging threats by identifying and understanding potentially dangerous actors, technologies, and materials, and prioritizing research and development activities including: 1) analyses of alternative technology options; 2) assessments of complex issues such as the relative risk of different chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threats; 3) experimentation and operational test and evaluation of technologies proposed for acquisition; 4) detailed technical characterization of potential biological threat organisms; 5) the creation of consensus standards that enable cost-effective progress across many fields; and 6) the determination of nuclear material characteristics through nuclear forensics techniques.
Identify and interdict unlawful acquisition and movement of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear precursors and materials by leveraging investigative and enforcement assets towards domestic and international movement of these materials and by engaging in information sharing with all stakeholders to monitor and control this technology.
Detect, locate, and prevent the hostile use of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear materials and weapons by 1) combining authorities and assets with other departments and agencies; 2) building the U.S. Government’s global nuclear detection capability through the Global Nuclear Detection Architecture, a framework for detecting (through technical and non-technical means), analyzing, and reporting on nuclear and other radioactive materials that are out of regulatory control; 3) advancing nuclear forensics capabilities in order to close down nuclear smuggling networks, promote global nuclear security, and deter would-be nation state terrorist facilitators from transferring nuclear materials to terrorists; 4) providing unimpeachable forensic data for use by law enforcement authorities in the investigation and prosecution of crimes involving biological agents; 5) regulating high-risk chemical facilities to ensure that they take proper steps to mitigate risks; and 6) preventing the occurrence of significant biological incidents, where possible, but, when unable to prevent, stopping them from overwhelming the capacity of our state, local, tribal, and territorial partners to manage and respond. To this last point, DHS will deploy technologies that enable early detection of biological agents prior to the onset of symptoms, pursue more rapid responder capabilities, and increase the capacity and effectiveness of local public health, medical, and emergency services.

Learn More

FY 14-15 Priority Goal: Strengthen aviation security counterterrorism capabilities by using intelligence driven information and risk-based decisions.

Statement:

Description:

Learn More

Goal 1.3: Reduce Risk to the Nation’s Critical Infrastructure, Key Leadership, and Events

Statement:

Reduce Risk to the Nation’s Critical Infrastructure, Key Leadership, and Events

Description:

We will pursue the following strategies to reduce risk to the nation’s critical infrastructure, key leadership, and events:

Enhance security for the Nation’s critical infrastructure from terrorism and criminal activity by 1) identifying critical infrastructure and related vulnerabilities; 2) developing and deploying a scalable assessment methodology depending on the level of threat and the nature of the target; 3) inserting and/or developing appropriate technologies; 4) tracking protective measures of our partners across the homeland security enterprise; and 5) conducting investigations that maximize disruption of criminal enterprises that pose the greatest risk to the United States. We will also enhance the Nation’s ability to counter improvise explosive devices (IEDs) by coordinating whole community efforts to prevent, protect against, respond to, and mitigate terrorist and criminal use of explosives.
Protect key leaders, facilities, and National Special Security Events by 1) working with partners across the homeland security enterprise to coordinate intelligence, information sharing, security, and response resources; 2) protecting the President, the Vice President, visiting heads of state, major Presidential candidates, and other designated protectees; 3) protecting federal facilities, employees, and visitors; and 4) assessing risk and coordinating support to partners during major special events across the Nation through the Special Events Assessment Rating.

Learn More