- Home
- Agencies
- Department of Agriculture
- Department of Housing and Urban Development
- General Services Administration
- Department of Commerce
- Department of the Interior
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Department of Defense
- Department of Justice
- National Science Foundation
- Department of Education
- Department of Labor
- Office of Personnel Management
- Department of Energy
- Department of State
- Small Business Administration
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Department of Transportation
- Social Security Administration
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of the Treasury
- U.S. Agency for International Development
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Veterans Affairs
- Goals
- Initiatives
- Programs
Primary tabs
Strategic Objective
Increase Payment Accuracy
Strategic Objective
Overview
We must protect the programs we manage from waste, fraud, and abuse. Ensuring proper payment to eligible beneficiaries is critical to that objective. Ensuring proper payments means not only preventing overpayments, but also, just as importantly, preventing underpayments.
We work hard to ensure that all beneficiaries receive the correct amount. Our payment accuracy rate for retirement and survivors benefits is greater than 99 percent. However, our DI and SSI programs are more error prone due to the complexity of the laws for both programs and the variability of SSI payments from month to month based on a recipient’s changes in income, resources, and living arrangements. We rely on recipients to self-report this information, and their failure to report timely is a significant reason for the difficulty in our SSI payment accuracy rate.
We have identified several strategies to increase payment accuracy in our DI and SSI programs and will work diligently to realize improvements in these areas:
- We will collaborate with other Federal and State agencies that serve similar populations, so we can benefit from shared ideas and best practices in ensuring proper payment. Among the potential solutions is better use of data exchanges to produce a more efficient and accurate process for receiving payment-affecting information. For example, we exchange data with the Department of Defense to verify entitlement to Special Veterans’ Benefits. In addition, the IRS shares Form 1099 information to help us verify SSI eligibility and payment amounts.
- We also will increase our partnerships with financial institutions to build on the success of our Access to Financial Institutions (AFI) initiative to identify financial resources that can affect SSI eligibility and often go unreported. AFI allows us to check SSI recipient bank records to ensure that recipients remain eligible for benefits. Over the next decade, this initiative will save American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.
- Even after we approve a person for benefits, we periodically review many of their cases to ensure that they continue to meet the eligibility requirements under each program. For example, we complete SSI redeterminations, which are periodic reviews of non-medical factors of SSI eligibility, such as income and resources. On average SSI non-medical redeterminations produce about $5 of net program savings per dollar spent, with savings from overpayments partly offset from the cost for underpayments.
- For many years, we have used predictive models (i.e., computer-based screening tools) and data analytics tools to improve the integrity of our programs. With data from other agencies and other sources in the private sector, we will explore additional uses of predictive models, data analytics, and automation tools to provide cost-effective means to increase payment accuracy.
- Our representative payee program historically has been vulnerable to fraud. Based on recommendations from oversight organizations, we have strengthened our policy, selection criteria, and review process. We are developing a long-term strategic approach to improving the program. Current efforts include using a predictive model that identifies cases with a higher probability of potential misuse and piloting a process for conducting criminal background checks on payee applicants during our selection process. We are also working with other agencies with similar programs to determine the potential for collaboration on payee activities.
Strategies:
- Collaborate with other Federal agencies, such as the Department of Veterans Affairs and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services within the Department of Health and Human Services, to find innovative ways to prevent and reduce improper payments;
- Increase efforts to recover overpayments;
- Enhance predictive models and automation tools to help identify error-prone aspects of benefit eligibility;
- Expand use of data analytics to reduce fraud and payment errors; and
- Streamline the Representative Payee Program to better identify potential misuse of benefits.
Progress Update
We took the following steps in FY 2015 to increase payment accuracy (see Key Initiatives and Performance Measures for more details):
- Expanded the use of data analytics and improved technology to:
- Identify patterns of fraud in our programs; and
- Prevent payment errors by identifying missed entitlements to benefits.
- Through data exchange partnerships with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, we have:
- Identified over $49 million in estimated incorrect payments;
- Referred 1,334 cases to the Office of Inspector General for investigation; and
- Uncovered 272 out-of-country cases.
- Implemented improvements to the Pre-effectuation Review (PER) model to help identify the most error-prone adult SSI DDS allowances for review;
- Identified 1,352 previously unreported deaths of U.S. beneficiaries abroad, resulting in potential overpayment savings of almost $7 million;
- Implemented a change to our address verification business process, allowing us to notify more delinquent debtors of a potential offset; and
- Expanded the payee monitoring program to better identify potential benefit misuse – expected to net an increase of 300 additional reviews over FY 2014.
Next Steps
- Monitor PER workloads on a weekly basis to ensure models and associated business processes are working correctly and as intended;
- Research the use of quarterly reported earnings data in the CDR predictive model to prioritize CDRs that are likely to result in suspension or termination;
- Develop systems, policy, and training to support the non-home real property process;
- Expand automated reciprocal death data exchanges to as many partner countries as possible; and
- Publish agency operating instructions to improve the business process for transmitting information to and from the Department of Veterans Affairs.